Tuesday, August 22, 2017

In Desolate Lands, Survival is Everything

Elizabeth Olsen and Jeremy Renner in "Wind River"
Photo Credit: Imdb.com
Taylor Sheridan has become a notable screenwriter over the last couple of years, providing audiences with the white-knuckle crime thrillers “Sicario” in 2015 and “Hell or High Water” last year.  With these two films, he has shown himself to be someone whose stories focus on characters and their morals when faced with the law.  

With Sheridan’s latest film, “Wind River,” which he both wrote and directed, he continues to display a serious talent for constructing crime stories.  While his writing is a little better than his directing in this case, he nevertheless delivers a tense and emotional journey through the frozen wilderness.

Cory Lambert (Jeremy Renner) is a US Fish and Wildlife Service agent tasked with investigating the killing of livestock on the Wind River Indian Reservation in Wyoming.  Upon his search, he finds the body of 18-year-old Natalie Hanson (Kelsey Chow).  When he reveals his findings to local law enforcement, the FBI is brought in to look into the case, with agent Jane Banner (Elizabeth Olson) leading the investigation, who asks Lambert to use his tracking skills to help her find those responsible for the young woman’s death.

Jeremy Renner’s performance is reminiscent of his work in 2009’s “The Hurt Locker,” in that both characters are very calculated in their work and provide us with an idea of their thought processes as they go about their duties.  In the scenes where his character is alone on a hunt, Renner obviously doesn’t have any dialogue; but even in these sections of the film, we still get a bit of that intensity he brings to his best roles because of how well he portrays Cory when he’s in his element, that being a game of survival.  Between these scenes and the ones where he interacts with other characters, his acting abilities and Sheridan’s writing give us a look into Cory through both his character’s actions and his words.

While there isn’t much to Olson’s character, she plays the part with the aggressiveness that’s needed for such an authoritative role.  And Gil Birmingham, who plays Kelsey’s father, manages to display the feelings of unimaginable loss and grief, all in just three scenes.

Similar to his last two screenplays, Sheridan’s work for “Wind River” offers a deceptively simple story, but it’s one that thrives on establishing his main characters.  Even before Cory makes the heartbreaking discovery of Natalie in the snow, the narrative offers us plenty of time to learn about his character, while still managing to keep a few things undisclosed about him until the time is right to reveal them.  And in between these moments of building the characters, the film offers enough of a plot to keep us invested, despite it being rather straightforward.  This is similar to what he did with “Hell or High Water,” in which he didn’t overdo it with the bank robberies and shootouts, but instead spent time in helping us become familiar with the characters.  “Wind River” has two big scenes with confrontations between the law and the suspects, but then the narrative takes us around the reservation, introduces us to its inhabitants, and brings us to different groups of suspects that may or may not have had a role in Natalie’s death.  Because of this, we have an understanding of what this kind of environment is like and the dangers that the main characters are up against.

Just like what we saw in “Sicario” and “Hell or High Water,” Sheridan places the story in isolated, intimidating, and near-barren landscapes, all of which are superbly captured by cinematographer Ben Richardson.  Through his lensing of these territories, he captures the bleakness that the characters must face as they do what they can to survive the unforgiving conditions.

Although Sheridan’s direction isn’t quite as memorable as the filmmakers with whom he worked before (Denis Villeneuve for “Sicario” and David Mackenzie for “Hell or High Water”), he does show he has learned a couple of things from those past experiences and could very well become a great director if he helms another movie or two.  We see evidence of this in a few scenes, namely the confrontation in the victim’s brother’s trailer and the climactic shootout between the law enforcement and their suspects.  

Sheridan’s recent body of work is enough to give any viewer confidence that he will continue to impress us with what he can do, and as someone who creates stories that bring us to places we wouldn’t want to go, Sheridan sure does have a talent of making us want to take the plunge.

Final Grade: B+

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

A Time of Civil Unrest in the Summer of 1967

John Boyega in "Detroit"
Photo Credit: Imdb.com
Kathryn Bigelow is a director whose last two movies focused on America’s modern warfare.  She dealt with the hunt for Osama bin Laden in “Zero Dark Thirty,” and the psychology of soldiers in “The Hurt Locker.”  Both of these films delivered layered stories that offered close looks at our nation’s involvement overseas and deep studies of the characters at the center of them.

For her latest movie, “Detroit,” Bigelow turns to one of America’s most tumultuous events: the Detroit riot of 1967.  While the film is unsettling, upsetting, and unflinching in its depictions of this occurrence, it’s not enough when trying to bring a full picture of a major turning point in race relations within our country.

In 1967, tensions have risen between law enforcement and African-Americans, with riots having practically gutted the infrastructure of Detroit.  It all reaches a frightening crescendo on the night of July 25-26, when a troop of police officers visits the Algiers Motel to investigate gunfire and end up violently interrogating a group of suspects.  

The whole cast delivers fine performances, such as those from John Boyega and Anthony Mackie, but they’re sadly underused.  Out of the whole cast, the two standouts are Will Poulter and Algee Smith.  Poulter gives a brutal performance as a police officer who’s relentless in his pursuit of those who he thinks are guilty.  Although his performance is relatively one-note (chalk that up to the screenwriting) he achieves whatever he can with the material and displays a frightening presence because of how far his character is willing to go to get what he wants.  

Despite Poulter’s memorable work in the film, Algee Smith, who plays an aspiring R&B performer, has the only role with an engaging arc, portraying someone who’s trying to use his musical talents to get out of Detroit, but unexpectedly gets caught up in the violence of the riots.  It’s a moving performance, one that manages to bring out a glimmer of hope in the end, even after everything that takes place earlier.

The screenplay by Mark Boal, who wrote “Zero Dark Thirty” and “The Hurt Locker,” doesn’t quite live up to the work he did for those two films.  While he dealt with the intricacies of the hunt for bin Laden in the latter and the mindset of a bomb-disposing army sergeant in the former, he doesn’t seem to capture the full scale of his subject this time around, limiting the film to just one part of the overall five-day riot for most of the movie.  Aside from the film’s limited scope of the riot, the narrative is also brought down at times by some heavy-handed bits of dialogue that seem below Boal’s screenwriting talents.

Although the occurrence at the motel was a significant part of the riot, it would have helped the narrative to dedicate a bit more time to the days of the riot that led up to what happened at the Algiers.  We get some of this in the first half hour, but then almost the whole rest of the movie is spent on the Algiers, with the trials of the accused officers coming in the last 20 minutes and feeling rushed.  The riot was a devastating event in 20th-century American history, and the film should have focused on the broader picture of it instead of just limiting itself to one night for most of the runtime.  Despite the movie already being almost two and a half hours, the story should have been about another half hour longer to allow us to see even more of what happened during those five days and what came after.

During his last two collaborations with Bigelow, Boal wrote main characters who were complicated, but he doesn’t do so with “Detroit.”  The possibility to accomplish this is present with Boyega’s role, given how his character is an African-American security guard who must uphold the law, while also trying to remain in a positive light amongst other African-Americans.  This is a plot point that could have provided a thought-provoking dilemma for his character, but it’s a situation that’s addressed in only one or two scenes.  It also wouldn’t have hurt to make Poulter’s character more layered.  I’m certainly not saying that his character should be more likable or sympathetic, but Boal maybe should have added a little bit more to Poulter’s role, instead of just having “racist police officer” be his only defining trait.

Bigelow has the ability to enthrall us in her filmmaking, like when she kept us on edge during the compound raid in “Zero Dark Thirty” and the bomb disposal scenes in “The Hurt Locker.”  While she makes you feel the intensity of the situation in “Detroit,” thanks to the hectic, yet assured camerawork from cinematographer Barry Ackroyd, who shot “The Hurt Locker,” most of the movie seems to rely on exploitative and repetitive depictions of the violence at the Algiers, representing a big step down from the more ambitious stories of Bigelow’s last two films.  This marks her third time in which she has brought politically and socially relevant stories to film, and although “Detroit” couldn’t be more timely in its arrival, it isn’t the hard-hitting exploration of events that these riots should have been given.

Final Grade: C